Movie Review Milk

Passionate bio-film explores gay maverick’s quest for equality

Milk

2:00 pm Feb 5 - by Syd Slobodnik – buzz Writer

  • Bookmark & Share
  • Print
  • Comments (8)
  • Feed of movies_tv articles

Related Media


    Related Video

    Milk


    Buzz says:   MPAA Rating: R
    Current Showtimes: No showtimes available

    While not as intensely powerful as Rob Epstein’s 1984 Oscar winning documentary The Times of Harvey Milk, Gus Van Sant’s Milk is a passionate and emotionally moving look at the eight critical years of the life of San Francisco’s first openly gay city supervisor and gay activist who was assassinated along with Mayor George Moscone in 1978 by a disturbed fellow supervisor Dan White. This film has justifiably been nominated for eight Academy Awards including best picture, director, actor and supporting actor.

    What distinguishes Van Sant’s film from the documentary (which was equally an indictment of the absurd legal system that allowed a killer’s freedom on a junk-food “Twinkie defense”) is the exploration of the more personal human side of Milk. Sean Penn plays Harvey with such natural enthusiasm, sincere intensity and uncanny imitation of the real Milk, you can’t help but feel for his highs and lows, as well as root for his cause. From his early days as a businessman establishing his camera store in San Fran’s Castro district with lover Scott Smith, to the suicide loss of another lover, and several runs for the city council and endless fights against hateful anti-gay ordinances, Penn brings to life a man of near manic desires.

    Van Sant and screenwriter Dustin Lance Black, frame the narrative with Milk retelling his personal story of his movement on a tape recorder with instructions that this should only be played upon his untimely death. The film effectively highlights Milk’s political skill at creating coalitions among other minorities, labor and political factions to lead movements against Coors beer, challenge a bigoted state senator’s plan to bar gay teachers and other workers from employment, and fighting the discrimination of Proposition 6 in California. The film only falls to bits of melodramatics toward its climactic events when Milk is challenged by supervisor White’s opposition to gay rights mandates in the city council and the inevitable murders.

    Along with Penn’s near career best performance, Van Sant assembles a cast with finely understated performances from Emile Hirsch, as young activist Cleve Jones, Diego Luna’s Latin lover Jack, James Franco’s Scott Smith, Alison Pill’s Anne Kronenberg, Milk’s enthusiastic lesbian ally and Josh Brolin’s tight collared, intensely bigoted Dan White.

    Sound Off

    The views expressed are the sole responsibility of the visitors who submitted them and do no represent the opinions of the217, WPGU, buzz or Illini Media staff members.

    Last post: Feb. 11, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    Sarah (unregistered user) said on Feb. 5, 2009 at 8:24 pm:

    I'm almost afraid to ask...

    but am I the only person on campus who didn't think this movie was that great?

    Magdalena Wrona (Magdalena Wrona) said on Feb. 6, 2009 at 1:12 am:

    Probably.

    I'm totally kidding, but I haven't really heard anyone say anything bad about this film. I thought it was amazing myself. Why didn't you like it?

    Sarah (unregistered user) said on Feb. 6, 2009 at 4:41 pm:

    haha
    No, I honestly probably am. It's a wonder my friends haven't shunned me.

    But performances aside (Penn and Franco are great, Brolin is fabulous), the script had more problems than I could count. It was like in attempts to explain things (how did Scott and Milk get together? who was Milk before his political career? why did people decide to support him?), they BARELY explained ANYTHING. It would have been better off picking up the film after all those things had been established instead of spending less than 5 minutes of film on the matter and pretending that it told the whole story.

    It's kind of like either *really* show me what happened or don't show it at all, you know?

    Also, the epilogue is a bit of a joke. It gives the after-story on characters who, while they might be important in real life, had almost no dialogue or role central to what you were supposed to care about in the movie...

    I almost would've preferred the Dan Brown movie. It seemed like there was a lot more going on in that area. Plus I have mad crazy love for Brolin ever since No Country... heh

    I'd still say it could be worth it to see, especially considering I know hardly anyone who agrees with me, but don't let the hype get to your head!

    Or watch The Wrestler instead.
    Because THAT was amazing.

    Magdalena Wrona (Magdalena Wrona) said on Feb. 9, 2009 at 5:37 pm:

    Maybe watching the Times of Harvey Milk will give you more of what you're looking for since you mentioned that you thought the movie didn't really show what happened.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088275/

    PG Springer (unregistered user) said on Feb. 9, 2009 at 6:51 pm:

    What strange and irrelevant criticisms, Sarah. And you must have missed the part where Harvey Milk picks up Scott in the subway on his birthday.

    (3 more comments) see more/fewer

    Add your comment:


    Put a name to your comments! Sign In or Register. Registered users can track their comments in their profile, use avatar images, and participate in forum discussions.