Movie Review - I'm Not There
Can the real Bob Dylan please stand up?
I'm Not There
3:00 pm Mar 8 - by Colin Bird – Buzz Writer
I'm Not There
Buzz says:



MPAA Rating: RCurrent Showtimes: No showtimes available
I’m Not There started out nicely enough, but after the first twenty minutes of mind boggling sequences I saw people leaving the theater. I, being no philistine, decided to ride the experience through. “Perhaps there’s something I was missing?” Sadly, if that were only the case! I’m Not There had high aspirations; and it is those hopes that set it up for its monumental failure.
If you simply judged the film from the previews and commercials, as I did, you probably thought you were going to see a biopic about Bob Dylan’s life: the struggle for exposure, drug problems (or a lack thereof), women problems, and limelight troubles. The false advertising left the audience and I unabashedly disappointed—because I’m Not There had nothing to do with Bob Dylan except for the use of his image.
Enter director Todd Haynes, the story of this fable that is Bob Dylan’s life. I imagine Haynes cursed the way the film was pushed by advertisers, because he might have wanted the audience to know what they were getting into, after all he typically creates avant-garde films. Haynes decided to tell the Dylan story through facsimiles, which went by several names. Those different stories, that weren’t correlated, were played by six different actors that looked and acted like Bob Dylan, but weren’t. Confused yet?
But this technique doesn’t make itself necessary; it feels too high concept and may have caused the writers to attempt more risky devices than they would have with a normal narrative. Out of all the narratives the least know actor did the best job—Marcus Carl Franklin (the small black boy) was the diamond in the rough. He was lively and likable, where as Heath Ledger bore little resemblance to any Bob Dylan that I know of (bless his soul), Cate Blanchett was doing whatever the hell she wanted, and Ben Whishaw’s monologues added nothing to the experience.
I haven’t explained the plot yet have I? Well…there isn’t one; the film is a montage of jumbled up Dylan lyrics, personified album art covers and epic one-liners. Even a Bob Dylan fan can’t think of much that redeemed this film, and like most in the audience—I would recommend you avoid I’m Not There as if it were the plague.
Sound Off
Sign In or Register to post a comment
The views expressed are the sole responsibility of the visitors who submitted them and do no represent the opinions of the217, WPGU, buzz or Illini Media staff members.
Last post: Mar. 13, 2008 at 5:22 pm
Jeff Brandt (Jeff Brandt) said on Mar. 13, 2008 at 5:22 pm:
I know this is slightly off-topic, but Bob Dylan sucks in concert these days. Unless your thing is incoherent rambling backed by visibly stoned upper-middle-aged guitarists. I guess it still is pretty sweet when Dylan plays harmonica.
20°

Michael Yohanan (Michael Yohanan) said on Mar. 9, 2008 at 6:43 pm:
it's sad to hear you didn't like this. i haven't seen it yet, although i do plan on still checking it out at boardman's.
i understand your argument, but wasn't the point of this film to be an exploration of narrative sequence and character development? Is a person just a complilation of different people's views and perspectives of them, or can they transcend and become something more?
i think everyone out there should take this film for what it is - challenging and cinematically original. sure it probably won't be as exciting as most of the fluff that comes out of Hollywood, but it will certainly be more interesting to see these actors try and pull something difficult off.
anyways, i can't wait for Boardman's next film to come - 4 months, 3 weeks and 2 days.